RAW photos can be better-dramatically better, in some cases-than JPEG photos, but it takes some work and know-how to get them there. (To be clear, RAW is not an acronym it’s written in uppercase by convention seemingly only to be parallel to JPEG, TIFF, PNG, and other image formats that are acronyms.) Plus, since professionals used it (and of course I wanted to be more like the pros), I dove from the high board into deeper photographic waters. RAW was better, I was told, because it encapsulates the raw data captured by the sensor without additional in-camera processing. When I decided to jump from point-and-shoot digital cameras to something more capable, I was faced with a new choice: should I capture images in RAW or JPEG format? Until that point, all my cameras shot JPEG, the imaging standard that can deliver great-looking but heavily compressed photos.
#1611: OS updates, RIP iPod touch, iCloud Drive shared folder data loss risk, KDEConnect links iPhone to LinuxĮditing RAW and ProRAW Photos Using RAW Power 3.#1612: OS suggestions, new accessibility features, higher cellular prices, Chrome OS Flex for old Macs, Memorial Day hiatus.
LINUX RAW IMAGE PROCESSING FOR MAC UPDATE
0 kommentar(er)
